Abstract
AIMS: Double or triple antithrombotic therapy (DAT/TAT) including or excluding aspirin in association with oral anticoagulant and P2Y12 inhibitor are currently two available options in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated efficacy and safety outcomes for DAT vs. TAT. METHODS AND RESULTS Four non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC)-based randomized controlled trials comparing DAT vs. TAT with a total of 10,938 patients were pooled. Bleeding events occurred more frequently than ischemic events. DAT as compared to TAT was associated to an increased risk of stent thrombosis (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10-2.14; p = 0.03), myocardial infarction (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04-1.46; p = 0.03) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.19; p = 0.04) and to a reduced risk of ISTH major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.62-0.93; p = 0.03). A consistent effect was observed in all safety endpoints. Intracranial haemorrhage was numerically reduced by DAT. No difference for all-cause death was observed. CONCLUSION Antithrombotic treatment in patients with AF undergoing PCI represents a trade-off between ischemia and bleeding. A careful patient selection based on baseline ischemic and bleeding risk may optimize the net clinical balance in this population.
